@article{strommen_topological_2021,
abstract = {The existence and behaviour of so-called `regimes' has been extensively studied in dynamical systems ranging from simple toy models to the atmosphere itself, due to their potential of drastically simplifying complex and chaotic dynamics. Nevertheless, no agreed-upon and clear-cut definition of a `regime' or a `regime system' exists in the literature. We argue here for a definition which equates the existence of regimes in a system with the existence of non-trivial topological structure. We show, using persistent homology, a tool in topological data analysis, that this definition is both computationally tractable, practically informative, and accounts for a variety of different examples. We further show that alternative, more strict definitions based on clustering and/or temporal persistence criteria fail to account for one or more examples of dynamical systems typically thought of as having regimes. We finally discuss how our methodology can shed light on regime behaviour in the atmosphere, and discuss future prospects.},
author = {Strommen, Kristian and Chantry, Matthew and Dorrington, Joshua and Otter, Nina},
date = {2021-04-08},
eprint = {2104.03196},
eprinttype = {arxiv},
journaltitle = {{arXiv}:2104.03196 [nlin, physics:physics]},
keywords = {1 - Atmospheric physics, 1 - Atmospheric science, 2 - Non-linear dynamics, 2 - Persistent homology, 3 - Dynamical system, 3 - Point cloud, 3 - Regime structure},
title = {A topological perspective on regimes in dynamical systems},
url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.03196},
urldate = {2021-04-09}
}